Thursday, July 31, 2014

Overcoming the free rider problem

The green arrows represent the circulation of money.
Recently, a columnist syndicated in this paper wrote a polemic against Ontario’s rebate for purchasing an electric car. She cites a friend whose new $140,000 Telsa garnered almost $10,000 in taxpayer-funded rebates intended to encourage the purchase of electric cars, but claims he would have bought that car anyway. Based on this, she complains the subsidy should only apply to lower-priced (non-luxury) vehicles, and that we are being unfair to less-affluent people (among whom she includes herself, despite being a syndicated national columnist) who buy a fuel-efficient gasoline car or ride transit.
While I object to several of her lines of reasoning, not least her attempt to pit rich against poor (and class herself with the poor) to attack a program that, in practise, mostly applies to more modestly-priced cars purchased by the middle class (this rebate was the deciding factor in my own recent purchase of an electric vehicle), she is getting close to describing a real problem in our governments’ approaches to addressing climate change.
Her appeal to nationalism – Teslas are made in California, while some economy cars are manufactured in Ontario (albeit by foreign parent companies) – is another red herring. The support of the right-wing for increased free-trade deals that outlaw buy-local programs is consistent, and the purpose of a new-technology purchase rebate isn’t to reward domestic manufacturers, but to create a new market that might attract that manufacture.
Nevertheless, what she is getting at, without naming it, is the “free rider” problem of energy efficiency subsidies, which has been studied by economists. Basically, assuming we want society to adopt cleaner or more efficient technologies that are stalled by the high cost for early adopters (a chicken-and-egg problem), then it makes sense to have some kind of financial incentive to encourage people. But since energy efficiency saves money in the long run, some people will be doing it already, yet they will also apply for the incentives. Any who would have done the green thing anyway, without needing a government hand-out, are the so-called “free riders”. If there are, for example, 3 free riders for each person whose decision was affected by the incentive, then you are spending $4 of subsidy for $1 of effective change. And I agree, that is not efficient use of taxpayer money.
So what to do instead? If pundits like this columnist would actually consult with economists, they would learn that the most effective approach is a carrot-and-stick, starting with the stick. The “stick” is a higher price on energy, particularly fossil energy, which increases the savings incentive to those who upgrade or conserve. You can then use that revenue to help fund alternatives, such as transit, or you can refund it to everyone equally, to help them all pay for improvements themselves. Either way, you achieve energy savings much more effectively for the dollars raised and spent, a more fiscally responsible course.
Another approach is to offer government loan guarantees allowing people to switch to new or more efficient energy without an up-front cost, by recovering the loan out of the monthly energy savings, something government can do at a very low cost.
However, since this same columnist seems to be very much against things like using new revenue to fund better transit (despite using transit users as her proxy suffering taxpayer) or using government debt to fund anything, then I doubt she will be interested in this non-partisan economic advice. Too bad, because it is a strong solution to the problem she has identified.

An edited version of this was published as my Root Issues column in the Barrie Examiner as "No more free rides for energy efficiency program"
Erich Jacoby-Hawkins is a director of Living Green and the Robert Schalkenbach Foundation.

Thursday, July 24, 2014

Carbon pricing makes sense to all but those paid to deny it

The perils of too low a carbon price.

Persistent high Liberal showings in opinion polls seem to have conservative punditry worried, as they’re already trying to discredit anything that looks like a Liberal policy a year before the next federal election.
The current target is carbon pricing, about which Liberal leader Justin Trudeau has mused. Of course, he’s not alone; carbon pricing has been a Green Party central plank for many years, and is supported by most environmentalists and mainstream economists in Canada and around the world, and even now by many oil companies themselves.
What is carbon pricing? Quite simply, it addresses our market failure, which promotes the excess extraction and burning of fossil fuels, by ensuring prices include full costs.
A key aspect of any well-functioning market economy, one which includes fair prices as a goal, is to avoid unaddressed externalities. An externality is when a transaction between two parties creates an extra benefit or harm to a third party not involved in the transaction. Externalities send wrong signals to markets.
Something that seems obvious is that you shouldn’t dump your garbage in my space without compensating me. You see this principle at work when you pay to take trash to the dump. Yet today we let people and corporations use our shared atmosphere as a free dump for fossil carbon and other pollutants. In letting them off without paying to cover the harms they create, we are in effect giving them a huge, market-distorting subsidy.
Now, I always thought conservative thinkers were against huge, market-distorting subsidies. But Canada’s political right-wing is captive to the fossil industries, so that rather than express a true conservative, market-based philosophy, they instead press for continued privileges for fossil extractors and burners. On top of that, they have been hacking away a century’s worth of prudent regulations, precautions, and basic scientific observation that serves to protect us from harms to natural systems and human health.
But back to carbon pricing, or what right-wing pundits call “a tax on everything”. It would seem that to them, burning carbon is everything. For the rest of us, huge sectors of our economy are low- or no-carbon. The value added to the economy by skilled workers is mostly carbon-free.
Even better, under most carbon pricing schemes, revenue from carbon fees is returned to the public either as tax breaks, like in British Columbia, or as a direct payment, under an equal dividend plan. Either way, the average person is actually better off, because the weight of a few carbon-intensive industries draws more fees, leaving less for the rest of us to pay.
Oh, and did I mention British Columbia? I can’t understand why these anti-carbon-price pundits always fail to mention that BC implemented a supposedly job-killing carbon tax shift 6 years ago. Since then, their government has been re-elected twice, their economy has grown faster than the national average, their greenhouse gas emissions have dropped while the nation’s have risen, while they have Canada’s lowest personal income tax rate and one of the lowest corporate taxes. To acknowledge all this carbon price success would totally undermine the pro-fossil position.
On second thought, I guess I do know why they always forget to mention it.

Published as my Root Issues column in the Barrie Examiner as "The great, ongoing carbon pricing debate"
Erich Jacoby-Hawkins is a director of Living Green and the Robert Schalkenbach Foundation.

Thursday, July 10, 2014

Be a hero: get good grades and free comics!

Be a hero, kid: get good grades and free comics!
One of the things that made this past Canada Day fun for me was the release of a new comic in one of my favourite franchises – Captain Canuck. Over the years, this all-Canadian hero has taken many forms – starting with a series published in the 70s but set in a fantasy future of the 90s where Canada was a world super-power and humans were actively colonizing space and encountering hostile aliens, helped by the unearthly powers of our own maple-leaf draped superhero.
Although this series only lasted half a decade, the Captain has been “re-born” in the form of a couple of other comic characters since, wearing similar costumes as the original but getting by on bravery and skill rather than super powers. I was also helped crowd-fund an animated web series about another Captain incarnation, whose apparently substantial powers have yet to be fully explained, but whose use of non-lethal weaponry stands in stark contrast to most American action offerings.
One of my favourite things about Captain Canuck being able to interact with his creators, like funding the series or meeting character originator Richard Comely, who regularly appears at various Ontario comic stores to sign comics, do custom drawings, and interact with fans young and old. The most recent edition even features a variant blank cover where Richard can draw in your own custom image!
Mr. Comely was in Barrie just yesterday, hosted by Big B Comics, but if you missed his visit, I’m sure he’ll be back another time. Last time I was at Big B was for another reason, though – so my daughters could access the Comics for Grades promotion.
I wrote about this last year, how Big B generously gives children free comics from their extensive back catalog for each A grade on their report card, to reward academic effort and promote the joy of reading. This year, they’ve sweetened the deal, giving a comic for a full letter-grade improvement between first and second terms, even if your child didn’t make it to A. So if she got a C in science in the fall but advanced that to a B for the end of the year, she gets a free comic, too.
Summer is a great time to get outside and play superhero, but there will also be rainy days when the kids end up in front of a TV or computer or video game. How about making sure they have some exciting reading, to brighten their minds without electronic input? The Comics for Grades program continues until the end of July, so dig out those report cards and see if your children are eligible to get some free fun summer super reading at Big B. My kids have moved on from their earlier super-heroes to the worlds of Adventure Time, the Regular Show, Richie Rich, Bart Simpson, and other silly stories told in picture and prose, which just shows that there are genres to suit children of many tastes. I hope yours develop the same love of the graphic reading arts.
Published as my Root Issues column in the Barrie Examiner as "Comics can inspire children to start reading"
Erich Jacoby-Hawkins is a director of Living Green and the Robert Schalkenbach Foundation.

Friday, July 4, 2014

Ignored No More

Is this a known demonstration?
For another Canada Day we were able to celebrate all that makes our nation great. But a day later, the frustration with unresponsive political leaders returns.
Recent elections and by-elections prove many Canadians don’t even bother to vote to choose their representatives, apparently either believing undifferentiated, or feeling their vote can’t make anything better. And given that we labour under an electoral system straight out of the 19th century, one can hardly blame them. Would Canadians tolerate 19th century medical, communications, or transportation systems? Would we ride carriages to the polls, keeping the windows shut tight to exclude harmful disease-causing vapours, hearing the pony express arrive with the latest mail from 2 weeks ago on the other coast? 3 of these 4 systems have been updated, only one left to go!
Our system promotes politicians who are disengaged from the public, because getting elected only requires a plurality of core party support, sometimes less than a third of the votes. Despite the efforts of MPs to come across as representing everyone in the riding, woe betide those whose political philosophy differs significantly from that of the party of the elected member.
We see this when we send letters (or nowadays, emails) to our local representative, party leaders, or cabinet ministers. You may see a form response from a staffer, perhaps rubber-stamped by the office-holder; other times, nothing but silence. I regularly email our Prime Minister and leaders of opposition parties about various important issues; the latter usually respond, but I can’t recall the last time I’ve even gotten acknowledgement from the ever-growing office of the PM, staffed with hacks paid from my tax dollars.
Recently, with members of Fair Vote Simcoe, I attended the office of our local MP to discuss the misnamed Fair Elections Act. Our MP mentioned that we were the first people to express to him objections to that bill. This surprised us, as we had, only a few weeks prior, attended his office with a few dozen other citizens to hand-deliver a stack of signed petitions against that bill! Although he was in Ottawa at the time, perhaps the message wasn’t passed on?
But never fear, your actions and words, if undertaken in public, will no longer be ignored by your government. A recent missive from the Government Operations Centre was sent to all federal departments, ordering them to provide information to compile “a listing of all known demonstrations which will occur” so they can be used to build “Situational Awareness”.
So there you go. Get some friends together and bring a sign or a petition to a representative’s office, or a public square, or any other location, really. Post plans for your “demonstration” on Facebook and send an email to the relevant ministry. And then, even if you feel your elected representative is ignoring you, you can take comfort knowing that in a dark office somewhere, an anonymous intelligence analyst in Canada’s internal spying network has noted your action for future reference. Ignored no more!

Published as my Root Issues column in the Barrie Examiner as "Some simple ways to get yourself noticed by government"
Erich Jacoby-Hawkins is a director of Living Green and the Robert Schalkenbach Foundation.

Thursday, June 26, 2014

Sharing the early fruits starts now

Mary-Jane surprised to learn sour cherries are actually a bit sour.
Nothing beats ripe fruit freshly picked. It blows away the taste of fruit harvested hundreds or thousands of miles away then shipped, trucked, or flown to your local store.
One great source of fresh fruit is “u-pick” operations, several of which surround Barrie. But since such farms are generally located in rural areas where transit does not reach, you need a car to get there & back.
That’s where my high-school friend “Peaceman” Jim Kogelheide comes in, by organizing a free bus trip from London to a local strawberry field, so city residents without car access can take advantage of the flavour, health, and budget benefits of picking their own fruit. Way to go, Jim!
But back here in Barrie, we have other local food initiatives on the go. Last year I helped found FruitShare, a program where we send teams of volunteers to the properties of urban fruit-tree owners to pick all the ripe fruit from their tree. The harvest is split between the owner, the volunteer pickers, and the Barrie Food Bank.
Last year we rescued over 3,000 lbs of fresh, ripe, local, organic fruit from local trees and about 20,000 lbs of other produce was donated, much of it inspired by the enthusiastic media coverage FruitShare received. So of course this year we’re going to do it again, bigger and better!
When we launched last July, we only envisioned the apples and pears that ripen in the fall. The very next day we discovered that sour cherries thrive in Barrie, and several trees were ripe, so picking began immediately! But we also heard of other crops, like currants, gooseberries, and mulberries, we had just missed. So if you have or know of a good set of bushes or canes producing any of those berries, please contact us and perhaps we can pick them this year.
Anyone wishing to register a fruit tree (apple, pear, or plum but also grape vines, nuts, the berries mentioned above, or elderberries ripening in late August) can visit and choose the TreeRegistration form in the “Get Involved” menu. Or you can sign up to pick fruit, fun and healthy for the whole family!
We are also looking for equipment donations, having already received specialized pickers from Bradford Greenhouses Garden Gallery, and baskets, tarps & gloves from Mapleview Canadian Tire. Our top needs right now are collapsible stepladders and materials to build a sturdy off-season storage shed by the Coulter Street community garden, where the City of Barrie will soon be planting the first trees of our community fruit forest.
Remember, we can find the pickers, and we can get the fruit to the people who need it, but you must tell us where that fruit is! If you have a neighbour, friend, relative, or co-worker with fruit we could pick, please show them this article or contact us directly and our coordinator Jenna will follow up. You can email or call 705-715-2255. Whether it’s to pick fruit, register a tree, or provide other assistance, we’d love to hear from you.

Published as my Root Issues column in the Barrie & Innisfil Examiners as "FruitShare sharing the wealth".
Erich Jacoby-Hawkins is a director of Living Green and the Robert Schalkenbach Foundation

Friday, June 20, 2014

Decline to decline your role in politics.

Your mandatory vote for me is muchly appreciated.

Last week was a provincial election, and perhaps the most surprising fact was that voter turnout bucked recent trends and rose a wee bit. Yet it was still just barely above half, which means almost half Ontario’s potential voters didn’t show up at the polls, which means their views will not be reflected at Queen’s Park.
The most ridiculous development around not-voting in this past election was the “decline your ballot” social media movement, built on the fantasy that if enough people showed up to vote but declined their ballots, the media or the parties would sit up and take notice and somehow change their ways. Well, I have news for you: no such luck. As a long-time party insider, even from a party particularly obsessed with democratic engagement, I can tell you that declined ballots go into the same big conceptual pile as spoiled ballots, blank ballots, and voters who don’t show up. All non-voters are at the bottom of the list for party engagement efforts.
In a decade of partisan political activity, people have told me many reasons for not voting, although a lot of them stem from a basic perception that voting doesn’t change anything, or the bizarre paradoxical complaint that “voting only encourages them”.
I certainly share the frustration of casting a ballot that doesn’t elect anyone, having done that almost every time I’ve voted. But I also know that every vote, even for a party that doesn’t win, has some effect on the political process, while not voting has none, except for letting the governing parties get away with more.
Many ridings are swing ridings – two or more parties have a strong chance of winning. And Barrie has proven to be a swing riding, first federally, and more recently, provincially, as we’ve gone PC-Liberal-PC-Liberal in 4 successive Ontario elections. In swing ridings, candidates and parties know the difference between victory and defeat can be just a few hundred votes, while third and fourth parties often pull in thousands of votes each. That means the contending candidates will try to seduce a segment of those votes, or at least try not to bleed any more away. So, for instance, in regions with strong Green Party vote results like the +10% in all 4 ridings bordering Lake Simcoe in 2008, environmental issues get more attention, and we even saw a characteristically enviro-hostile Harper government commit a surprising (but welcome) $30 million to improving our lake.
But if you feel your vote is ineffective, the answer isn’t to spurn it. We have a fairly open political system in Canada: you can join any political party and take part in choosing that party’s local candidate, leader, and (sometimes) policy direction. And since only 1% of us ever do that, you will have a disproportionate effect, especially if you recruit some like-minded friends alongside you. Join the party that sits closest to your values, or even start your own, and you’ll find you can actually influence the voting options to the point that you will always see a ballot choice deserving of your support, and will never again feel your vote won’t count.
You will never get more responsive government by backing away; by engaging, you will be able to exert a real (if small) influence.

Published as my Root Issues column in the Barrie Examiner as "Declined ballots go into the scrap pile".
Erich Jacoby-Hawkins is a director of Living Green and the Robert Schalkenbach Foundation

Thursday, May 1, 2014

Trees and creeks are crucial to saving our cities

Great crop of shovel handles this year!
Pollution threatens the air we breathe and the water we drink, wash with, and swim in. But water issues go beyond pollution; not just water quality but water quantity can be a problem natural flows are disrupted.
Traditional urban/suburban development creates non-porous surfaces that repel water instead of absorbing it the way previous forests and meadows did. Rainwater then runs more quickly to streams and rivers, causing streams to overflow their banks. The traditional solution was to shore up the banks, straighten and smooth out the streams so the water could quickly flow past instead of flooding. But this creates new problems, especially as climate change brings more extreme weather like heavy rain or snowfall between longer droughts. Meanwhile, the removal of trees and shrubs from slopes or riverbanks speeds up topsoil erosion.
The solution is a return to natural ways of slowing and infiltrating rainwater, using vegetation and porous surfaces. Most streams that flow near or through our community are in sore need of restoration: planting more trees and other natural vegetation along the sides, returning to a meandering course through pools and water vegetation, and protecting as much porous surface as possible to slow the arrival of rain or melt water to streams. Renaturalizing water flow reduces the entry of pollutants or excess nutrients into our waterways, helps fish, prevents erosion, and offsets some effects of population growth and continued development.
One aspect of this work is the Creeks Project, an ongoing initiative of the Lake Simcoe Regional Conservation Authority. This wide-ranging set of efforts supports maintaining and improving the Lovers Creek and Barrie Creeks subwatersheds connecting to Lake Simcoe.
A big aspect, and a way you can participate, is through tree-planting. Trees provide many benefits, of course: they clean air and water, their blossoms feed bees, trees stabilize the land, produce oxygen we breathe and sequester carbon from the air, provide shade in the summer and wind breaks in the winter, create food and habitat for all kinds of wildlife.
But trees also play a special role in supporting our creeks. Their roots hold staggering amounts of water, helping to prevent or reduce flooding. They prevent erosion of stream banks. They help to clean and filter water before it enters our flowing streams. It has been estimated that a single tree, over 50 years, can provide as much as $150,000 worth of environmental services! Because of these many benefits, planting trees is among the cheapest, safest, and most effective ways of mitigating climate change.
That’s why Living Green partners with the Conservation Authority’s Creeks Project through the Urban Canopy Coalition to help plant more trees in our community. And our main task is to get you involved in this project. The two big ways you can help is through volunteering for our tree planting days, or through donations or sponsorships. On May 10th we are planting trees sponsored by the City of Barrie with a free BBQ provided by the Barrie South Lion’s Club. Then on May 24th, we are planting trees sponsored by the Rotary Club of Barrie-Huronia. If you are interested in helping out you can register at, and if your business or organization would like to sponsor this worthy project, please email to connect with us. We look forward to hearing from you!

Published as my Root Issues column in the Barrie Examiner as "Upcoming tree-planting helping the environment"
Erich Jacoby-Hawkins is a director of Living Green and the Robert Schalkenbach Foundation.